Instantly convert between NTRP, UTR, and WTN ratings. Built by competitive USTA league players, for competitive players.
Approximate equivalencies across all three major tennis rating systems. Ranges overlap because player styles and competitive contexts vary.
| NTRP | UTR Range | WTN Range | Level | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 1.0 – 2.0 | 39 – 40 | Beginner | Just starting out. Working on getting the ball over the net consistently. |
| 2.5 | 2.0 – 3.5 | 36 – 39 | Beginner+ | Can sustain a rally on moderate shots. Developing basic stroke mechanics. |
| 3.0 | 3.5 – 5.0 | 32 – 36 | Adv. Beginner | Fairly consistent on medium-paced shots. Starting to develop directional control and serve placement. |
| 3.5 | 5.0 – 7.0 | 28 – 32 | Intermediate | Consistent rallying with some variety. Developing topspin, net game, and tactical awareness. Most popular USTA league level. |
| 4.0 | 7.0 – 9.0 | 23 – 28 | Adv. Intermediate | Dependable strokes with directional control and depth. Can hit with power when the opportunity is there. Competitive USTA league level. |
| 4.5 | 9.0 – 11.0 | 18 – 23 | Advanced | Mastering power and spin. Can handle pace, vary strategies, and force errors. Strong serve with placement variety. |
| 5.0 | 11.0 – 12.5 | 12 – 18 | Expert | Good shot anticipation. Can execute a game plan. First and second serves are weapons. Comfortable at net. |
| 5.5 | 12.5 – 13.5 | 6 – 12 | Elite Amateur | Developed weapons (big serve, heavy topspin). Can compete at sectional/national level. Former college players. |
| 6.0+ | 13.5 – 16+ | 1 – 6 | Professional | National/international tournament players. Current or former touring professionals. |
The National Tennis Rating Program is the USTA's official rating system used for league play across the United States. Ratings range from 2.0 (beginner) to 7.0 (touring pro).
The Universal Tennis Rating is an algorithm-based rating that updates after every match. It aims to be the most accurate, real-time measure of a player's current ability.
The World Tennis Number is the ITF's global rating system, designed to give every tennis player worldwide a single, comparable number.
These are approximate equivalencies based on publicly available data, community observations, and cross-referencing player profiles that appear in multiple systems. Actual equivalencies vary because each system weighs different factors (UTR considers score margin, NTRP is win/loss based, WTN uses its own algorithm). Think of these as useful guidelines, not exact conversions.
This is extremely common. NTRP updates once per year and can lag behind your actual ability. UTR updates after every match, so it reflects your current form. Also, UTR penalizes you for losing badly even to higher-rated opponents, while NTRP treats all losses more equally. If you've improved recently, your UTR may outpace your NTRP.
The USTA calculates an internal "dynamic" rating that updates throughout the year based on your match results. However, they don't publish this number. Your official NTRP only changes at year-end. Sites like TennisRecord attempt to estimate your dynamic rating based on publicly available match data. MyTennisRating will offer a similar estimated dynamic rating with deeper analytics.
First, understand that bumps are based on match performance data, so your results suggest you're competitive at the higher level. Many players feel nervous after a bump but end up thriving. If you genuinely believe the bump is wrong, USTA offers an appeal process — contact your local section for details. The best strategy is to embrace the challenge and view it as recognition of your improvement.
Each has strengths. NTRP is required for USTA league play and is the most widely understood in the US. UTR is the most real-time and granular, factoring in score margins. WTN aims to be the global standard. For US recreational players, NTRP is the one that matters most for league registration, but UTR gives you the most current picture of your ability. Ideally, you'd track all three — which is exactly what MyTennisRating is building.